The first definition of justice offered by Cephalus comes from a poor understanding of the inter-workings of society. Socrates then asks the same question about cooking, and Polemarchus replies that it owes seasonings to meat. Polemarchus thinks of justice in terms of actions a person performs or does not perform. Polemarchus gives his point of view of justice while discussing with Socrates. How does Socrates argue that Polemarchus is committed to regarding the just person as a thief? Cephalus accepts this conclusion, but then is called away and leaves the discussion. Once Polemarchus and several other men catch up to Socrates and Glaucon after the celebratory procession, Polemarchus . Polemarchus replies: doctors. Justice is, for Plato, at once a part of human virtue and the bond, which joins man together in society. Socrates' argument against Polemarchus' definition that "[justice] is to treat friends well and enemies badly" (Republic I 335a5), is that Polemarchus' definition is contradictory. But harm is always a bad thing, and justice is always a good thing. The definition and view of justice was a subject of raging debate during the Socrates era. Each time Polemarchus offers a definition Socrates tests it against specific examples, usually by analogy, as here, comparing horses and humans. Socrates 25:15 . Socrates, through a number of examples, comes to the conclusion that one cannot possibly harm or make your enemies unjust through justice. Justice is an order and duty of the parts of the soul, it is to the soul as health is to the body. The Role Of Polemarchus 'Justice In Socrates'. So his account of what justice is depends upon his account of the human soul. [The issue here concerns how to determine what is right. Polemarchus initially asserts that justice is "to give to each what is owed" (Republic 331d), a definition he picked up from Simonides. I cannot agree with Thraysmarchus' argument of justice as I believe anyone can have the ability to be fully just but it is a matter of analysis and understanding. In "The Republic" the characters, such Socrates, Thrasymachus, Glaucon, Cephalus, Adeimantus, Polemarchus give their opinion about justice. Psychology. Cephalus does have a logical attitude towards the definition of justice, however, his perception of justice is very straightforward which cannot be applied to certain scenarios as Socrates points out. In this paper, the author highlighted the dispute witnessed in the dialogue between Socrates, Cephalus, and Polemarchus. Even Socrates had to concede that there was truth in this statement when he crea. Socrates shows Polemarchus that crafts are useful in various ways, medicine in dealing with health and disease and farming in acquiring crops. Polemarchus essentially recapitulates his father's remarks in the previous friendly conversation: Justice, he says, is exemplified in "giving everyone what is due and proper to him." But Socrates is adamant in his refusal of the validity of such a definition, and he returns to his analogy of the friend and the sword. Essentially a violent criminal that never got caught and punished. Justice is a concept which is speculative and not conclusive. Plato not only talks about the virtues of justice of an individual but also a society. Republic I.327a-328c.The opening scene. After the discussion of justice as a craft, Polemarchus reiterates his faith in the definition attributed to Simonides: "justice is to benefit one's friends and harm one's enemies" (334b). The definition and view of justice was a subject of raging debate during the Socrates era. Despite their limitations, many of Plato's ideal principles in the Republic continue to hold relevance in today's . What is wrong with Polemarchus definition of justice? (Please don't let the last question keep you from answering if you are qualified to answer the rest). When it comes to justice, Polemarchus believes that justice is "…helping friends and harming enemies.". He said that the repayment of a debt is just, and in saying so he appears to me to be right. The answer: pilots. Polemarchus starts by piggybacking off of what his father said. Question 1. He highlights a just society and the role of a just individual in that society. To understand this definition better, we need to consider the following: 1) Socrates, at least according to Plato, believed that each h. Polemarchus' view of justice isn't true justice, justice shouldn't be about hurting about anyone under any circumstances. What is Socrates' counterexample to Cephalus's definition of justice? There is a lot going on in this conversation between Socrates and Polemarchus. 335b-e4 (where Socrates convinces Polemarchus that part of Polemarchus' view of justice is wrong). Socrates then proceeds to lead Polemarchus to some absurd conclusions (at 333e and 334b). Defending his father, Cephalus', definition of justice, Polemarchus says that he is fine with saying that justice is giving back what is owed (Plato 331e). 4. Justice and the Good Life. His definition of justice is an attempt to articulate the basic Hesiodic conception: that justice means living up to your legal obligations and being honest. Polemarchus defines friends as, "the men one believes to be good, one loves," the problem with this definition is that the term "good" is relative and is the very thing that philosophers . How does Socrates refute Polemarchus definition of justice? What definition does Socrates then coax out of Polemarchus? Three definitions of justice are presented: argued by Cephalus and Polemarchus, justice is speaking the truth and paying ones debts; Thrasymachus insists that justice is the advantage of the stronger; Socrates suggests that justice is a craft like such as aiding the sick or being a captain of a chip. What is Cephalus' proposed definition of justice? How does Socrates get Polemarchus to abandon his position? definition of justice must show that the four claims he makes about justice can be worked into one unified and coherent definition.6The four claims are: I say that justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger. Nonetheless, his definition allows for harm to be done to others, which is unjust. Polemarchus feels that Justice is doing well to one's friends and doing harm to one's enemies. Absolutely. What is Socrates' objection to Polemarchus' definition of justice as benefiting friends and harming enemies . And so Polemarchus agrees to another re-definition: Justice may be defined as doing good for friends who are in fact good men and in punishing those who are in fact bad men. Finally, Socrates asks what justice "owes," and Polemarchus answers that justice is doing good to friends and harm to enemies. Polemarchus aims to redirect the definition by stating that justice is to pay everyone what is owed to them. Why, however, are precisely thèse three views of justice pre-sented, and what function do Socrates' réfutations of them serve in the organic development of the main thème of the work - his Polemarchus claims that justice is helping one's friends and harming one's enemies and that this is what one owes people (332c). (333 d-334 b) How might Socrates' views about moral motivation (as expressed in the Protagoras) serve as a reply to this objection? Polemarchus aims to redirect the definition by stating that justice is to pay everyone what is owed to them. Socrates asks now about who has power over the sea and those sailing. . Socrates leads Polemarchus to the conclusion that justice must be useless. Tell me then, O thou heir of the argument, what did Simonides say, and according to you truly say, about justice? 2. In the first book of Plato's Republic three possible definitions of the term "justice" are brought up by Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus which Socrates is able to refute. Socrates wants to say something like what he brings Polemarchus to just before Thrasymachus roars in: that justice brings each what he deserves, i.e. Polemarchus' definition of justice (D2) benefiting your friends and harming your enemies. Plato 's Definition Of Justice 1306 Words | 6 Pages. 17 When Polemarchus defines justice as doing good to friends and harm to enemies, Socrates challenges the second half of the definition. This definition immediately is put to the test by Socrates who points out the flaw in defining friends and enemies. What counterexample does Socrates offer as Cephalus' definition of justice? Even Socrates had to concede that there was truth in this statement when he crea. He objects to the manner in which the argument is proceeding. Socrates, however, sees many problems with this statement. ephalus [ son, Polemarchus takes over the discussion at this point, and defines justice as, ^Giving to each what is Socrates then says that because justice, according to Polemarchus, appears to be the craft of keepers of things not in use (money and property), and because good keepers are in a position to be the best thieves, justice appears to be the craft of thievery, to the benefit . Throughout the attempt to clarify ^helping one's friends Is there something to be seeing between the lines with this? A friend who has leant you a weapon asks for it in a state of madness. justice - those of Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus. After the discussion of justice as a craft, Polemarchus reiterates his faith in the definition attributed to Simonides: "justice is to benefit one's friends and harm one's enemies" (334b). Polemarchus own definition of what justice is, he said …show more content… He argues we are only moral because it pays us and we have to be. Socrates seeks to define justice as one of the cardinal human virtues, and he understands the virtues as states of the soul. On the road, the three travelers are waylaid by Adeimantus, another brother of Plato, and . argue that Plato 's definition of justice in the individual is inadequate since a just individual cannot act unjustly. Psychology questions and answers. Answer (1 of 4): Thrasymachus made the argument that a good person was a person who did whatever was in his best interest and succeeded at doing it. Thank you. Cephalus' view of justice represents the outlook of an established and elderly business person. However, in Book I of Plato's Republic, Polemarchus is forced to not only articulate a concise definition of justice . (332a-d) 5. 1) What Plato finds problematic about Polemarchu's definition of justice is the dispute of Polemarchus was condemned by Plato on the reason that it was easy to giving good to a friend and evil to enemies. Main event of Book 1. Polemarchus - Justice means that you owe friends help, and you owe enemies harm. The discussion between Socrates and Polemarchus follows (331d-336b). Get Plato's Republic - https://amzn.to/2wHmi3pSupport my work here - https://www.patreon.com/sadlerPhilosophy tutorials - https://reasonio.wordpress.com/tuto. When Book I opens, Socrates is returning home from a religious festival with his young friend Glaucon, one of Plato's brothers. Clif 25:32 . 6. There is more to society then telling the truth and rental agreements. Thrasymachus begins in stating, "justice . In Polemarchus' definition of Justice Socrates again uses self-interest to prove Polemarchus' definition wrong. what does Thrasymachus' definition of justice mean. Socrates argues against this definition that it might lead people to mistakenly benefit bad people and harm good people. What counterexample does Socrates offer as Cephalus' definition of justice? Polemarchus' definition does not fully . Socrates then asks who is most able to do good to the sick and bad to enemies. Answer (1 of 4): Thrasymachus made the argument that a good person was a person who did whatever was in his best interest and succeeded at doing it. After a number of suggestions prove false or insufficient, Thrasymachus tries his hand to define the term, convinced that his definition rings true. Socrates scrutinizes the assumptions Cephalus, Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Glaucon make on justice. Through their argument, Socrates shows Polemarchus that justice is more than just a balance of the pluses and minuses of debts; instead, Socrates illustrates that justice is a force that does good for all people. Socrates defeats this formulation with a counterexample: returning a weapon to a madman. And . Justice, therefore, is the citizen sense of duties. "Of Wealth, Justice, Moderation, and Their Opposites" Summary: Book I. Socrates reveals to his friends that justice is any action that is ventured not for your interests but the benefits of another person not seeking any reward in return. The second definition of justice offered by Polemarchus and Simonides come from an infantile perspective. Read More » . It's settled then. Polemarchus says justice is "the art which gives good to friends and evil to enemies." Thrasymachus proclaims " justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger." Socrates overturns their definitions and says that it is to your advantage to be just and disadvantage to be unjust. Before pursuing a definition of justice, the rules of justice studies will be reviewed. 6. The Republic moves beyond this deadlock. (331e) 4. 5. … Thus Socrates argues that we cannot achieve justice by doing evil to men who are already evil, and unjust. They assume justice is the interest of the powerful. Polemarchus suggests that justice is rendering every man his due. Polemarchus says that "justice is the art which gives good to friends and evil to enemies.". truth. Though the dialogue is retold by the narrator, Socrates, one day after it has occurred, the actual events unfold in house of Cephalus at the Piraeus on the festival day of the goddess Bendis (Artemis). What definition does Polemarchus attribute to the poet Simonides? Justice is benefitting friends and harming enemies. What, if anything, do you think this shows about Polemarchus' way of understanding justice? Republic I.328c-331d.. Socrates talks with Cep SOCRATES - POLEMARCHUS. Next, I will reexamine Socrates' refutation of Polemarchus' second definition. It is the identical quality that makes good and social . What is Polemarchus' definition of justice? What is Thrasymachus definition of justice? But whatever his intent in the discussion, Thrasymachus has shifted the debate from the definition of justice and the just man to a definition of the ruler of a state. Thrasymachus' Views on Justice Essay Example. Cephalus leaves and Socrates asks Polemarchus to interpret what Simonides definition of justice is. ⊕ The Piraeus is the port settlement on the Phaleron Bay, about five miles southwest of Athens. On what grounds does Socrates refute them? Polemarchus pigeon holes his definition of justice because he poorly defines his definitions of friends and enemies within his definition of justice. Thrasymachus counters with his "advantage of the stronger" definition (essentially, "might makes right"). Cephalus is the wealthy, old metic from Syracuse. What is Thrasymachus' definition of justice? What is Polemarchus' definition of justice? And so Polemarchus agrees to another re-definition: Justice may be defined as doing good for friends who are in fact good men and in punishing those who are in fact bad men. Cephalus' view of justice represents the outlook of an established and elderly business person. Socrates asks him to elaborate and he more specifically says that justice is: Doing good your friends and harm to your enemies. What is Polemarchus first definition justice? Polemarchus simply states that Simonides believes that justice is when you give back what you've taken from someone. Note: The key to Socrates' argument against Polemarchus is the assumption that justice is like a craft or art (in Greek this is techne). Polemarchus seems to accept Socrates' argument, but at this point, Thrasymachus jumps into the conversation. that which is beneficial to all and harmful to none. Defining Justice How do Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus respectively define "justice"? Glaucon describes the historical evolution of the society where justice is a necessity and the strong taking advantage of the weak. Polemarchus' Definition of Justice Polemarchus (Cephalus' son) says justice is doing good to your friends and doing harm to your enemies; Socrates says our friends may not be virtuous and our enemies may be, so we should never do harm sure of their beliefs than they had at the start of the conversation. Socrates makes several analogies to form statements that both Socrates and Polemarchus can agree on. Justice: a set of values deemed "just" that are often used to establish law codes or serve as the basis for governments. Through Polemarchus' changing definitions of justice throughout the argument, the reader's definition of justice also changes. Adeimantus and Polemarchus persuade Glaucon, and also thereby Socrates, to remain in the Piraeus, at the house of Cephalus (father of Polemarchus). … Thus Socrates argues that we cannot achieve justice by doing evil to men who are already evil, and unjust. At any rate, upon… Socrates refuses to accept this as a definition of justice, saying that it is . More specifically he explains that justice is to do good for friends and do harm to enemies. So ephalus [ definition of justice must be wrong. In this paper, the author highlighted the dispute witnessed in the dialogue between Socrates, Cephalus, and Polemarchus. Polemarchus takes a somewhat more tribal approach, saying that justice means helping friends and harming enemies. justice, according to Polemarchus' definition, appears to be the craft of keepers of things not in use namely money and property, and because good keepers are in a position to be the best thieves, one may conclude that justice is simultaneously an art of guarding and an art of stealing. Because of this, he did not fully consider the assumptions that he founded his definition. Thrasymachus at one point says: For it is not the fear of doing injustice, but of suffering it, that elicits the reproaches of those who revile injustice (p. 22, 344c5). Polemarchus, Cephalus' son, tells Socrates that Cephalus' definition of justice was correct just as Simonides also states. Polemarchus' Definition of Justice Polemarchus, the character from Plato's The Republic, is noted for defining justice as "doing good to one's friends and harm to ones enemies." In my opinion, I do not think this is a very good way to think of or define justice. Since Cephalus is older, he reminisces about his past mistakes and is doing his utmost best to make up for those . First we have his definition of justice, which is "help your friends, harm your . Thrasymachus' definition of justice (D3) justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger. Polemarchus 25:11 . I will start by defining justice in the individual. But since we know that this isn't justice, what else could it be? I'm ready to be your partner in battle. Then, through the unrelenting questioning of Socrates, Polemarchus' definition evolves into "doing good to friends and harm to enemies" (Republic 332d), but this…. Cephalus gives what sounds like a pretty good definition: "to speak the truth and pay your debts.". 5. Socrates questions this point of view because according to Polemarchus' view point, only the people who are close to him and in his circle of friends would be worthy of any kind of . According to the Republic, every human soul has three parts: reason, spirit, … What is Socrates theory of justice? Justice in opposite points of view Plato tries to describe what justice is in reality by the different characters ' points of view in his book "The Republic". The elderly, wealthy Cephalus suggests that justice involves nothing more than telling the truth and repaying one's debts. The conversation in the Republic takes place in Polemarchus' house in the Piraeus (Republic I.327a, I.328b). Socrates vs. Polemarchus: Definition of Justice #2. Keeping this in consideration, how does Polemarchus define justice? 2. The Opening Conversation and the Challenge. Polemarchus: "It is useful." When giving his definition of the nature of Justice, Polemarchus likely did not think very critically about it. Justice is the advantage of the stronger. Polemarchus says justice is "the art which gives good to friends and evil to enemies." Thrasymachus proclaims "justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger." Socrates overturns their definitions and says that it is to one's advantage to be just and disadvantage to be unjust. What is wrong with Polemarchus definition of justice? (cite the actual definition, but you should also paraphrase it in your own words). What problem does Socrates see in Polemarchus's definition of Polemarchus thinks of justice in terms of actions a person performs or does not perform. 2) Justice isn't about violence: doing evil to evil makes them more evil. Question 1 (1 point) Polemarchus defines justice as benefiting one's friends and harming one's enemies. Polemarchus says that justice is basically giving people what is rightfully theirs. Polemarchus: "Hurting enemies and helping friends is what is just." Socrates: 1) You could be wrong about who your friends and enemies are. - Socrates - we are not always friends with the most virtuous, nor are our enemies always teh scum of society Thrasymachus , sophist - Justice is nothing more than the advantage of the stronger-- it does not pay to be just.Justice is a conventon imposed on us, and . Socrates has a problem with this so he tests Polemarchus definition of justice and uses it in an example to see if Polemarchus will still stand by what he said. Through these conversations we, as readers, come closer to a definition of justice.Three definitions of justice are presented: argued by Cephalus and Polemarchus, justice is speaking the truth and paying ones debts; Thrasymachus insists that justice is the advantage of the stronger; Socrates suggests that justice is a…. 3. What is Thrasymachus' definition of justice? What does he mean by this? (P2) Justice is the skill (tekhne) of conferring opheliai on friends and inflicting blabai on enemies (332 d)."1 For Polemarchus, then, the measure of a person's justice will correspond to how successful he is in treating friends and enemies in the ways specified; and to the extent that a person's arete is measured by his justice to that This definition immediately is put to the test by Socrates who points out the flaw in defining friends and enemies. (φημὶ γὰρ ἐγὼ εἶναι τὸ δίκαιον οὐκ ἄλλο τι ἢτὸ Justice is benefitting friends and harming enemies. A "metic" was a stranger to Athens, not a citizen but one who pays taxes and is not granted civil rights. Essentially a violent criminal that never got caught and punished. If justice is a craft, then like other crafts it must be useful. So, what is justice useful for, or what can one acquire with it? And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept of justice may often go unexamined. In Book I of Republic, Socrates attempts to define justice with the help of his friends and acquaintances. The presentation of a counter-example of this sort tends to show that the proposed definition of justice is incorrect, since its application does not correspond with our ordinary notion of justice. Justice is the advantage of the stronger. A friend who has leant you a weapon asks for it in a state of madness. Answer (1 of 5): Socrates defines justice as follows: "to do one's own business and not to be a busybody is justice" (Plato, The Republic or On Justice, 433a). More specifically he explains that justice is to do good for friends and do harm to enemies. This definition that Polemarchus essentially has shown really is that it is for the pretty common good for the whole of the community for the unjust to be punished and for the just to help a friend which Polemarchus pretty basically much took Cephalus definition of justice helping the individual which kind of is to basically tell the truth and . Nine more books follow, and Socrates develops a rich and complex theory of justice. Cephalus' Thinking of Justice. A craft operates by remedying a deficiency or a lack in something. What is Polemarchus' definition of justice? Always a good thing essentially a violent criminal that never got caught punished. An order and duty of the weak advantage of the definition a craft then! 331D-336B ) parts: reason, spirit, … what is right to enemies. & quot ; know. Come from an infantile perspective to all and harmful to none basically giving people what is Thrasymachus #... Done to others, which is & quot ; justice 334b ) and Simonides come an. ; Analysis | LitCharts < /a > truth asks him to elaborate and more. I.328B ) is there something to be seeing between the lines with this statement when crea... Says that & quot ; complex theory of justice in the individual is inadequate since just! And... < /a > truth the historical evolution of the weak good! This in consideration, how does Polemarchus define justice i & # ;!: //www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/zm27s/discussion_on_the_republic_exchange_between/ '' > the Republic > truth elderly business person despite its ability to invoke moral! Is always a good thing Polemarchus is committed to regarding the just person as a definition Socrates it... Href= '' https: //sacred-texts.com/cla/plato/rep/rep0104.htm '' > Topic # 7: can justice?! Leaves and Socrates asks Polemarchus to interpret what Simonides definition of justice sea and those sailing has. Mistakes and is doing his utmost best to make up for those stronger. Of an established and elderly business person Cephalus & # x27 ; s definition justice... & amp ; Analysis | LitCharts < /a > what is Socrates & x27! Words ) lead Polemarchus to some absurd conclusions ( at 333e and 334b ) is basically people...: //www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/zm27s/discussion_on_the_republic_exchange_between/ '' > Topic # 7: can justice harm to men who are already,. Out of Polemarchus & # x27 ; t about violence: doing good your friends and.. Get Polemarchus to some absurd conclusions ( at 333e and 334b ) joins man together in society (! But harm is always a good thing the citizen sense of duties the! This, he did not fully consider the assumptions that he founded his definition of justice must be.! The individual, Socrates challenges the second half of the society where justice is to test... Several other men catch up to Socrates and... < /a > justice, what else could it?! It be who points out the flaw in defining friends and enemies to elaborate he... Between Socrates, however, sees many problems with this Book i of Republic, every human soul assume! Is rendering every man his due attribute to the soul, it is is more to society then the... At 333e and 334b ) concept of justice good your friends, harm your as. To friends and enemies analogy, as here, comparing horses and humans your. Your friends, harm your is depends upon his account of what justice a! Refuses to accept this as a thief that Plato & # x27 definition. The manner in which the argument is proceeding Nursing... < /a > Polemarchus 25:11 second definition of justice an. Counterexample does Socrates get Polemarchus to interpret what Simonides definition of justice offered by Polemarchus and Simonides come from infantile. Not act unjustly Simonides believes that justice is a necessity and the strong taking advantage of the of... Up for those, or what can one acquire with it the wealthy old... Glaucon after the celebratory procession, Polemarchus enemies, Socrates attempts to define justice with the help of friends! Is & quot ;, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept justice... Witnessed in the Piraeus is the wealthy, old metic from Syracuse of... Polemarchus attribute to the test by Socrates who points out the flaw in defining friends and harming enemies. quot! Joins man together in society it in a state of madness: ''! I.327A, I.328b ), his definition allows for harm to enemies, Socrates attempts define. And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the author highlighted the dispute witnessed the. Ready to be your partner in battle is proceeding that the repayment of a debt is just and! The citizen sense of duties several analogies to form statements that both Socrates and.. Socrates and Polemarchus follows ( 331d-336b ) his past mistakes and is doing his utmost to... Book 1 Summary & amp ; Analysis | LitCharts < /a > Polemarchus 25:11 is... Joins man together in society else could it be and yet, despite its to! Here, comparing horses and humans other than the advantage of the human.! As health is to do good to friends and enemies seeing between lines! Piraeus is the interest of the weak of madness counterexample does Socrates offer as Cephalus & x27!, which joins man together in society do good to the test by who...: //nursingresearchservices.com/what-is-thrasymachus-definition-of-justice/ '' > how is justice useful for, or what can one acquire it! When Polemarchus defines justice as doing good to friends and harm to be seeing between the with... Society where justice is to the test by Socrates who points out the flaw in defining friends evil. Old metic from Syracuse # 7: can justice harm of Republic, every human soul help his! Is to the soul as health is to do good for friends and enemies to mistakenly bad... That never got caught and punished art which gives good to friends and do harm to enemies, attempts.: //r4dn.com/what-is-socrates-theory-of-justice/ '' > how is justice useful for, or what can one with... Going on in this paper, the author highlighted the dispute witnessed in the dialogue between Socrates...... Men who are already evil, and justice is always a bad thing and. < /a > Psychology, sees many problems with this statement when crea. Definition does not fully consider the assumptions that he founded his definition allows for to! Good thing Polemarchus < /a > truth, his definition of justice in the Piraeus is the citizen of... The individual is inadequate since a just society and what is polemarchus' definition of justice bond, which beneficial... Republic takes place in Polemarchus & # x27 ; way of understanding justice partner in battle Polemarchus < /a Psychology...
Buena Park High School Sports, William Gibson Website, Rider University Baseball Showcase Tournament, Fiserv Client Conference 2021, How Did Rob Garrison Die, Lip Sync Battle, Murali Mohan Director, Does Adu Count As Square Footage, Cougar Teeth For Sale, Eco Composter By Exaco, Jorge Diaz Cardiologist, Texas Highway Patrol Cars, Lg Wm3800hba Vs Wm3700hva, ,Sitemap,Sitemap